It would be easy to dismiss the concerns of Blackburn Rovers fans. And I did, until the New York Rovers – the Blackburn Rovers Supporters NYC – shared with me their concerns, which are detailed below.
Blackburn fans have been calling for the sacking of the club’s manager, Steve Kean, since early this season. I assumed it was yet another case of fans blaming the manager for their side’s poor performance on the pitch and the club’s bad management decisions. And that sort of thing really grinds my gears. When a team is facing difficulties, the easiest and obvious thing to do is fire the manager, though that rarely corrects the problem (unless his name is Gasperini). In fact, I’m sitting on an article I’ve written that basically ass-rapes those who demanded Bradley’s head and praised the appointment of Klinsmann to manage the US men’s national team. But that’s another story for another day.
Back to Blackburn. For those unfamiliar with the woes of Ewood Park, Kean had taken over the job from Sam Allerdyce back in December 2010, following his sacking. So let’s have a look to see if Kean is the real problem, or if it’s something harder to correct.
A Tale of Two Managers
As Rovers fans note, Kean has had a record of 8 wins, 13 draws, and 21 losses over 42 EPL matches. If you look at Allerdyce’s last 42 fixtures at the helm of Blackburn, he had a record of 14 wins, 13 draws, and 15 losses. Better, yes, but hardly damning of Kean.
Allerdyce averaged 1.30 points per game over that span, which – with Blackburn’s 20 games to date – would move them up to somewhere between 12th & 14th place in the table, with 23 points. And in fairness to Kean, his average of 0.88 points per game would bump the squad up to 16th or 17th place, just above the relegation zone with 17.6 points. Unfortunately, this season has been weighing down Kean’s average, as Blackburn sit at the bottom of the table with a mere 14 points.
Along those lines, it should be noted that 17 of the 27 players on last season’s roster returned this season, giving Kean a fairly similar side to work with. Some of the more notable departures (Mame Diouf and Roque Santa Cruz, along with Jermaine Jones) were due to loan spells ending. Two others were sent out on loan. And of the other five departures, only one – Phil Jones, arguably their greatest loss – is still playing top-level soccer. Kean added 14 players to the roster this season, but with the exception of Yakubu, the Nigerian striker who has netted 12 goals in 15 appearances, the rest have had little impact – hardly surprising given that their average age is only 22.
Now, in fairness to all, the aforementioned commentary about how the side under Allerdyce is similar to or different than what Kean has to work with is superficial as best. I haven’t been following the club. But it does appear, at least from looking at rosters online, that the only real loss – besides the loans – was Phil Jones. And Yakubu seems to have made up for the loss of any attacking players.
So, what I’m trying to say is that Kean may not be the root of Blackburn’s problems. Despite their past glories, they are – like many in the league – facing an increasingly competitive field. The clubs that can afford to (and are willing to) step-up their investment will likely prosper while those who don’t will continue to suffer. Of course there are always exceptions, and there seem to be more than usual this season.
Numbers on the Scoreboard vs. Numbers in the Stands
But I didn’t write this piece to try to persuade Rovers fans to give up the calls for Kean’s head. No, on the contrary, I think Blackburn should sack him. It’s a simple business decision. If your customers expressed dissatisfaction with a key figure in your organization, who had been performing below expectations, of course you’d replace him.
The real problem – and the impetus for this rambling article – is the way the club is being run. And Rovers fans, in making their case for changes, articulate this well. Reading their public complaint below, I couldn’t help but notice the similarities between the dysfunction in Blackburn and what we’ve seen here in New York with the Cosmos, who appear to have flamed-out on the proverbial launchpad.
Under the new Venky’s ownership, several key staffers were dismissed from Blackburn – including the club’s chairman – and those positions remain vacant. This has only exasperated a pitiful lack of communication, with the owners keeping fans in the dark – and at a distance.
While the new New York Cosmos weren’t always forthcoming with information under the Kemsley regime, it’s been a virtual blackout (like their much-celebrated fashion line) since Sela Sport took over. And, following the world’s slowest corporate house-cleaning, the new new New York Cosmos (henceforth to be known as CosmoSela) have failed to replace anyone.
As much as I loathe the tinkering owners like Roman Abramovich, Venky’s and Sela are even more infuriating with their absenteeism. It’s as if the folks at Venky’s have acquired a new chicken processing plant and are trying to reduce expenses to increase profitability. Though I’ve never embarked on either enterprise, I think it’s safe to say that making deep-fried clumps of chicken scraps is not the same as running a soccer club. Soccer customers are far more fickle – and vocal. And, as Venky’s may soon learn, the money they save on management expenses won’t cover their loss in revenue as fans stop going to games and purchasing merchandise. Not to mention the drop-off in revenue resulting from relegation. Indeed, I doubt the nuggetmeisters will be too “Kean” on that.









Great article. Some more information can be found at:
http://roverstruth.co.uk
Lots of background info, along with a collection of Steve Kean and Venkys quotes.